Art criticism plays a pivotal role in shaping how audiences perceive porcelain sculptures, bridging the gap between artistic intent and public interpretation. By analyzing form, technique, and cultural context, critics provide frameworks that elevate these delicate works beyond mere craftsmanship.

The impact of critique manifests in three key ways. First, it educates viewers about subtle nuances—the interplay of glaze textures, structural innovations, or historical references that might escape untrained observation. Second, influential reviews can dramatically alter market perceptions, transforming overlooked pieces into celebrated masterpieces.

However, criticism also carries risks. Over-intellectualization may distance casual admirers, while conflicting interpretations can create fragmented understandings of an artist's vision. The most effective critiques balance technical analysis with accessible language, preserving the emotional resonance that makes porcelain sculpture uniquely captivating.

Ultimately, art criticism serves as both mirror and lens—reflecting contemporary values while focusing attention on aspects that reveal deeper meanings in ceramic artistry. This dynamic conversation between creator, critic, and audience continually reshapes the cultural significance of porcelain as an artistic medium.